IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Gloeochaete-witrockiana-SAG46_84_CAMPEP_0193985370 and Gloeochaete-witrockiana-SAG46_84_CAMPEP_0193996306 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Thalassiosira-weissflogii-CCMP1010_CAMPEP_0193031834 and Durinskia-baltica-CAMPEP_0199911176 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Thalassiosira-weissflogii-CCMP1010_CAMPEP_0193031834 and Thalassiosira-weissflogii-CCMP1010_CAMPEP_0193038532 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Thalassiosira-weissflogii-CCMP1010_CAMPEP_0193031834 and Kryptoperidinium-foliaceum-CAMPEP_0189917804 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Thalassiosira-weissflogii-CCMP1010_CAMPEP_0193031834 and Glenodinium-foliaceum-CAMPEP_0188237400 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Karenia-brevis-Wilson-CAMPEP_0189325148 and Karenia-brevis-SP3-CAMPEP_0189227560 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Glenodinium-foliaceum-CAMPEP_0188411078 and Kryptoperidinium-foliaceum-CAMPEP_0189808736 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Durinskia-baltica-CAMPEP_0199951138 and Kryptoperidinium-foliaceum-CAMPEP_0189903316 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Karenia-brevis-CCMP2229-CAMPEP_0188914096 and Karenia-brevis-Wilson-CAMPEP_0189324510 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Karenia-brevis-SP1-CAMPEP_0189020334 and Karenia-brevis-CCMP2229-CAMPEP_0188865700 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Prorocentrum-minimum-CCMP2233-CAMPEP_0191045770 and Prorocentrum-minimum-CCMP1329-CAMPEP_0191030634 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Prymnesium-parvum-Texoma1_CAMPEP_0191218192 and Emiliania-huxleyi-379_CAMPEP_0187639624 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Prymnesium-parvum-Texoma1_CAMPEP_0191218192 and Prymnesium-parvum-Texoma1_CAMPEP_0191270208 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING: Sequences Perkinsus_marinus-EER20685.1 and Perkinsus_marinus-EER03781.1 are exactly identical IMPORTANT WARNING Found 14 sequences that are exactly identical to other sequences in the alignment. Normally they should be excluded from the analysis. An alignment file with sequence duplicates removed has already been printed to file H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50.fa.reduced This is RAxML version 8.1.3 released by Alexandros Stamatakis on August 13 2014. With greatly appreciated code contributions by: Andre Aberer (HITS) Simon Berger (HITS) Alexey Kozlov (HITS) Kassian Kobert (HITS) David Dao (KIT and HITS) Nick Pattengale (Sandia) Wayne Pfeiffer (SDSC) Akifumi S. Tanabe (NRIFS) Alignment has 136 distinct alignment patterns Proportion of gaps and completely undetermined characters in this alignment: 2.76% RAxML rapid bootstrapping and subsequent ML search Using 1 distinct models/data partitions with joint branch length optimization Executing 100 rapid bootstrap inferences and thereafter a thorough ML search All free model parameters will be estimated by RAxML GAMMA model of rate heteorgeneity, ML estimate of alpha-parameter GAMMA Model parameters will be estimated up to an accuracy of 0.1000000000 Log Likelihood units Partition: 0 Alignment Patterns: 136 Name: No Name Provided DataType: AA Substitution Matrix: LG Using fixed base frequencies RAxML was called as follows: raxml -f a -s H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50.fa -n RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 -m PROTGAMMALG -T 16 -p 12345 -N 100 -x 12345 Time for BS model parameter optimization 0.202853 Bootstrap[0]: Time 7.624107 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11421.504938, best rearrangement setting 13 Bootstrap[1]: Time 7.253774 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12269.086726, best rearrangement setting 13 Bootstrap[2]: Time 5.890982 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12725.118125, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[3]: Time 6.128404 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11772.124938, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[4]: Time 6.314775 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11348.659002, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[5]: Time 6.768918 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12589.576416, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[6]: Time 6.278909 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12351.097585, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[7]: Time 6.752754 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12323.840853, best rearrangement setting 14 Bootstrap[8]: Time 6.087709 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11896.540086, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[9]: Time 5.791937 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12548.695689, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[10]: Time 6.178988 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12659.866712, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[11]: Time 6.210934 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12093.338989, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[12]: Time 6.968443 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12057.717399, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[13]: Time 6.031239 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12634.169381, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[14]: Time 6.880308 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11790.708034, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[15]: Time 5.982348 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12037.000053, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[16]: Time 6.579039 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11653.503527, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[17]: Time 6.205584 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11564.007503, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[18]: Time 5.626919 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12032.210008, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[19]: Time 6.106113 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11737.781035, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[20]: Time 7.465284 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12022.507452, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[21]: Time 5.914754 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12478.788478, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[22]: Time 6.082145 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12632.539574, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[23]: Time 6.708344 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12597.898600, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[24]: Time 6.948360 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13441.831305, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[25]: Time 7.770659 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12630.735368, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[26]: Time 7.097020 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11481.963800, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[27]: Time 7.379396 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12368.501482, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[28]: Time 6.996028 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12940.982886, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[29]: Time 7.930755 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12288.276890, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[30]: Time 7.127387 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12555.361442, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[31]: Time 6.603925 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12302.681548, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[32]: Time 5.912762 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11266.991426, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[33]: Time 6.856653 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12933.119489, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[34]: Time 6.616633 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11871.120857, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[35]: Time 6.124576 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12704.630955, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[36]: Time 6.827826 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12378.154817, best rearrangement setting 9 Bootstrap[37]: Time 6.288735 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12896.098928, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[38]: Time 7.230177 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11485.931413, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[39]: Time 7.179578 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11712.425780, best rearrangement setting 13 Bootstrap[40]: Time 6.743273 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11500.031101, best rearrangement setting 13 Bootstrap[41]: Time 7.422288 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13322.264385, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[42]: Time 5.663138 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12267.527414, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[43]: Time 6.385737 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11274.970368, best rearrangement setting 14 Bootstrap[44]: Time 7.501991 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13166.070332, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[45]: Time 6.615665 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12156.034154, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[46]: Time 6.573906 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11734.547091, best rearrangement setting 14 Bootstrap[47]: Time 6.225129 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12323.456318, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[48]: Time 7.025170 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11741.812840, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[49]: Time 6.194633 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12218.718507, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[50]: Time 6.986765 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13229.668351, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[51]: Time 7.139001 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13397.829987, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[52]: Time 7.429249 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11272.345787, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[53]: Time 6.751601 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12252.020320, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[54]: Time 5.986099 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12294.393069, best rearrangement setting 9 Bootstrap[55]: Time 7.543034 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11986.487433, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[56]: Time 5.936177 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11843.515306, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[57]: Time 7.006920 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11650.508843, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[58]: Time 6.521081 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12430.871616, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[59]: Time 6.891101 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12361.655621, best rearrangement setting 9 Bootstrap[60]: Time 6.440002 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12110.198705, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[61]: Time 6.475146 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12487.230982, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[62]: Time 6.451232 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12180.745283, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[63]: Time 7.029961 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11770.965418, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[64]: Time 7.511574 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12228.266089, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[65]: Time 6.688151 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11892.034159, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[66]: Time 6.159579 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13371.280455, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[67]: Time 7.316347 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12144.546104, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[68]: Time 6.560725 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12308.688701, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[69]: Time 5.867491 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11643.285529, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[70]: Time 6.895740 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12668.350060, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[71]: Time 7.045805 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11918.052285, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[72]: Time 7.739916 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12105.645809, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[73]: Time 6.667959 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12211.824800, best rearrangement setting 9 Bootstrap[74]: Time 6.933817 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11695.862230, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[75]: Time 6.304300 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11737.416757, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[76]: Time 7.021287 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12307.000360, best rearrangement setting 9 Bootstrap[77]: Time 6.920937 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12119.583270, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[78]: Time 7.069951 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11983.989255, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[79]: Time 7.052206 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11304.473412, best rearrangement setting 9 Bootstrap[80]: Time 7.305614 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12109.274668, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[81]: Time 6.977229 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12096.667336, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[82]: Time 6.827979 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11376.514174, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[83]: Time 5.734428 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12304.210644, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[84]: Time 7.333369 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11777.512933, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[85]: Time 6.708749 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11743.153706, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[86]: Time 5.910131 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12211.373916, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[87]: Time 6.840761 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -13528.928078, best rearrangement setting 7 Bootstrap[88]: Time 6.839375 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11940.992831, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[89]: Time 6.705784 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12423.677235, best rearrangement setting 10 Bootstrap[90]: Time 6.727727 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12240.350958, best rearrangement setting 8 Bootstrap[91]: Time 6.168834 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11537.752156, best rearrangement setting 12 Bootstrap[92]: Time 6.930138 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12919.538487, best rearrangement setting 13 Bootstrap[93]: Time 6.387618 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -10889.747894, best rearrangement setting 15 Bootstrap[94]: Time 5.893562 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12203.284536, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[95]: Time 5.892261 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12363.636918, best rearrangement setting 5 Bootstrap[96]: Time 6.573105 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11995.109214, best rearrangement setting 13 Bootstrap[97]: Time 7.991290 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -11529.146976, best rearrangement setting 11 Bootstrap[98]: Time 6.117869 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -10673.302315, best rearrangement setting 6 Bootstrap[99]: Time 7.647267 seconds, bootstrap likelihood -12157.129553, best rearrangement setting 14 Overall Time for 100 Rapid Bootstraps 669.063488 seconds Average Time per Rapid Bootstrap 6.690635 seconds Starting ML Search ... Fast ML optimization finished Fast ML search Time: 1083.378138 seconds Slow ML Search 0 Likelihood: -12486.553792 Slow ML Search 1 Likelihood: -12487.160431 Slow ML Search 2 Likelihood: -12490.067614 Slow ML Search 3 Likelihood: -12492.223001 Slow ML Search 4 Likelihood: -12488.695521 Slow ML Search 5 Likelihood: -12490.604249 Slow ML Search 6 Likelihood: -12492.319480 Slow ML Search 7 Likelihood: -12489.115819 Slow ML Search 8 Likelihood: -12485.163712 Slow ML Search 9 Likelihood: -12493.969369 Slow ML optimization finished Slow ML search Time: 602.565257 seconds Thorough ML search Time: 23.625942 seconds Final ML Optimization Likelihood: -12485.134948 Model Information: Model Parameters of Partition 0, Name: No Name Provided, Type of Data: AA alpha: 1.064811 Tree-Length: 42.733929 rate A <-> R: 0.399182 rate A <-> N: 0.259945 rate A <-> D: 0.371058 rate A <-> C: 2.337364 rate A <-> Q: 0.910775 rate A <-> E: 0.975241 rate A <-> G: 1.940106 rate A <-> H: 0.336984 rate A <-> I: 0.140697 rate A <-> L: 0.371240 rate A <-> K: 0.503815 rate A <-> M: 1.055520 rate A <-> F: 0.238237 rate A <-> P: 1.105868 rate A <-> S: 4.439041 rate A <-> T: 2.009090 rate A <-> W: 0.169702 rate A <-> Y: 0.205613 rate A <-> V: 2.392567 rate R <-> N: 0.706048 rate R <-> D: 0.116398 rate R <-> C: 0.501968 rate R <-> Q: 2.636754 rate R <-> E: 0.341785 rate R <-> G: 0.366408 rate R <-> H: 2.278690 rate R <-> I: 0.119250 rate R <-> L: 0.283449 rate R <-> K: 5.940467 rate R <-> M: 0.454623 rate R <-> F: 0.049508 rate R <-> P: 0.312264 rate R <-> S: 0.805843 rate R <-> T: 0.543695 rate R <-> W: 0.557424 rate R <-> Y: 0.295274 rate R <-> V: 0.160471 rate N <-> D: 4.766737 rate N <-> C: 0.496537 rate N <-> Q: 1.592389 rate N <-> E: 0.508692 rate N <-> G: 1.350015 rate N <-> H: 4.234381 rate N <-> I: 0.179830 rate N <-> L: 0.064256 rate N <-> K: 2.014327 rate N <-> M: 0.348390 rate N <-> F: 0.084068 rate N <-> P: 0.151925 rate N <-> S: 3.764032 rate N <-> T: 1.878729 rate N <-> W: 0.042610 rate N <-> Y: 0.574720 rate N <-> V: 0.078587 rate D <-> C: 0.058743 rate D <-> Q: 0.491483 rate D <-> E: 4.924234 rate D <-> G: 0.793424 rate D <-> H: 0.870603 rate D <-> I: 0.010038 rate D <-> L: 0.014157 rate D <-> K: 0.265711 rate D <-> M: 0.023991 rate D <-> F: 0.016354 rate D <-> P: 0.370412 rate D <-> S: 1.164675 rate D <-> T: 0.399902 rate D <-> W: 0.028068 rate D <-> Y: 0.126872 rate D <-> V: 0.035653 rate C <-> Q: 0.079639 rate C <-> E: 0.003286 rate C <-> G: 0.534566 rate C <-> H: 0.601499 rate C <-> I: 0.301083 rate C <-> L: 0.557800 rate C <-> K: 0.012457 rate C <-> M: 0.839207 rate C <-> F: 1.037881 rate C <-> P: 0.070787 rate C <-> S: 2.614753 rate C <-> T: 1.073780 rate C <-> W: 0.629281 rate C <-> Y: 1.094488 rate C <-> V: 1.839864 rate Q <-> E: 3.876936 rate Q <-> G: 0.251626 rate Q <-> H: 4.520102 rate Q <-> I: 0.068413 rate Q <-> L: 0.546954 rate Q <-> K: 3.037150 rate Q <-> M: 1.570619 rate Q <-> F: 0.033669 rate Q <-> P: 0.586241 rate Q <-> S: 1.149231 rate Q <-> T: 1.014297 rate Q <-> W: 0.221802 rate Q <-> Y: 0.241650 rate Q <-> V: 0.197511 rate E <-> G: 0.327583 rate E <-> H: 0.398044 rate E <-> I: 0.041567 rate E <-> L: 0.065426 rate E <-> K: 1.697022 rate E <-> M: 0.163145 rate E <-> F: 0.017664 rate E <-> P: 0.393844 rate E <-> S: 0.574671 rate E <-> T: 0.567695 rate E <-> W: 0.073107 rate E <-> Y: 0.112720 rate E <-> V: 0.230098 rate G <-> H: 0.292498 rate G <-> I: 0.008174 rate G <-> L: 0.041563 rate G <-> K: 0.278555 rate G <-> M: 0.131033 rate G <-> F: 0.084125 rate G <-> P: 0.184955 rate G <-> S: 1.633930 rate G <-> T: 0.121922 rate G <-> W: 0.252125 rate G <-> Y: 0.051346 rate G <-> V: 0.072026 rate H <-> I: 0.102245 rate H <-> L: 0.343988 rate H <-> K: 0.654763 rate H <-> M: 0.415502 rate H <-> F: 0.640560 rate H <-> P: 0.477834 rate H <-> S: 0.929667 rate H <-> T: 0.548649 rate H <-> W: 0.560661 rate H <-> Y: 4.983361 rate H <-> V: 0.111759 rate I <-> L: 3.892408 rate I <-> K: 0.149373 rate I <-> M: 4.013113 rate I <-> F: 1.044902 rate I <-> P: 0.073509 rate I <-> S: 0.060198 rate I <-> T: 0.970728 rate I <-> W: 0.104854 rate I <-> Y: 0.218350 rate I <-> V: 10.000000 rate L <-> K: 0.129119 rate L <-> M: 5.927594 rate L <-> F: 2.434657 rate L <-> P: 0.233879 rate L <-> S: 0.171176 rate L <-> T: 0.284471 rate L <-> W: 0.581863 rate L <-> Y: 0.281383 rate L <-> V: 1.598956 rate K <-> M: 0.616581 rate K <-> F: 0.022460 rate K <-> P: 0.366530 rate K <-> S: 0.703048 rate K <-> T: 1.067567 rate K <-> W: 0.046864 rate K <-> Y: 0.123890 rate K <-> V: 0.173913 rate M <-> F: 1.689205 rate M <-> P: 0.093763 rate M <-> S: 0.325811 rate M <-> T: 1.897216 rate M <-> W: 0.653740 rate M <-> Y: 0.451968 rate M <-> V: 1.782983 rate F <-> P: 0.088706 rate F <-> S: 0.339765 rate F <-> T: 0.154944 rate F <-> W: 2.307349 rate F <-> Y: 7.328222 rate F <-> V: 0.614777 rate P <-> S: 1.256567 rate P <-> T: 0.536635 rate P <-> W: 0.089332 rate P <-> Y: 0.084151 rate P <-> V: 0.278428 rate S <-> T: 6.077767 rate S <-> W: 0.233693 rate S <-> Y: 0.376132 rate S <-> V: 0.092373 rate T <-> W: 0.132241 rate T <-> Y: 0.230856 rate T <-> V: 2.054781 rate W <-> Y: 2.959699 rate W <-> V: 0.177959 rate Y <-> V: 0.234116 freq pi(A): 0.079060 freq pi(R): 0.055940 freq pi(N): 0.041980 freq pi(D): 0.053050 freq pi(C): 0.012940 freq pi(Q): 0.040770 freq pi(E): 0.071580 freq pi(G): 0.057340 freq pi(H): 0.022350 freq pi(I): 0.062160 freq pi(L): 0.099080 freq pi(K): 0.064600 freq pi(M): 0.022950 freq pi(F): 0.042300 freq pi(P): 0.044040 freq pi(S): 0.061200 freq pi(T): 0.053290 freq pi(W): 0.012070 freq pi(Y): 0.034150 freq pi(V): 0.069150 ML search took 1709.667741 secs or 0.474908 hours Combined Bootstrap and ML search took 2378.732032 secs or 0.660759 hours Drawing Bootstrap Support Values on best-scoring ML tree ... Found 1 tree in File /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_bestTree.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 Found 1 tree in File /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_bestTree.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 Program execution info written to /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_info.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 All 100 bootstrapped trees written to: /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_bootstrap.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 Best-scoring ML tree written to: /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_bestTree.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 Best-scoring ML tree with support values written to: /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_bipartitions.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 Best-scoring ML tree with support values as branch labels written to: /N/dc2/projects/marinovg/2014-06-19-MMETSP/2015-07-10-final-analysis/RAxML/RAxML_bipartitionsBranchLabels.RAxML-H3-with-other-lineages+CENP-A.muscle.minCov50 Overall execution time for full ML analysis: 2378.782510 secs or 0.660773 hours or 0.027532 days