QC Report

	general
Report generated at	2021-11-01 03:53:22
Title	ATAC-seq for HTAN cell type Stem.
Description	The path to the taglign is gs://caper_in/CRC_finemap/tagalign/Stem.tsv.gz
Pipeline version	v1.10.0
Pipeline type	atac
Genome	hg38
Aligner	bowtie2
Sequencing endedness	{'rep1': {'paired_end': True}}
Peak caller	macs2

Alignment quality metrics

Annotated genomic region enrichment

	rep1
Fraction of Reads in universal DHS regions	0.5339413677864719
Fraction of Reads in blacklist regions	0.0006868317282778081
Fraction of Reads in promoter regions	0.2191481130422045
Fraction of Reads in enhancer regions	0.39366745580003204

Signal to noise can be assessed by considering whether reads are falling into known open regions (such as DHS regions) or not. A high fraction of reads should fall into the universal (across cell type) DHS set. A small fraction should fall into the blacklist regions. A high set (though not all) should fall into the promoter regions. A high set (though not all) should fall into the enhancer regions. The promoter regions should not take up all reads, as it is known that there is a bias for promoters in open chromatin assays.

Replication quality metrics

IDR (Irreproducible Discovery Rate) plots

Reproducibility QC and peak detection statistics

	overlap	idr
Nt	0	0
N1	288567	256566
Np	0	0
N optimal	288567	256566
N conservative	288567	256566
Optimal Set	rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2	rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2
Conservative Set	rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2	rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2
Rescue Ratio	0.0	0.0
Self Consistency Ratio	1.0	1.0
Reproducibility Test	pass	pass

Reproducibility QC

N1: Replicate 1 self-consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling Rep1 reads)
N2: Replicate 2 self-consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling Rep2 reads)
Ni: Replicate i self-consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling RepX reads)
Nt: True Replicate consistent peaks (comparing true replicates Rep1 vs Rep2)
Np: Pooled-pseudoreplicate consistent peaks (comparing two pseudoreplicates generated by subsampling pooled reads from Rep1 and Rep2)
Self-consistency Ratio: max(N1,N2) / min (N1,N2)
Rescue Ratio: max(Np,Nt) / min (Np,Nt)
Reproducibility Test: If Self-consistency Ratio >2 AND Rescue Ratio > 2, then 'Fail' else 'Pass'

Number of raw peaks

	rep1
Number of peaks	299767

Top 300000 raw peaks from macs2 with p-val threshold 0.01

Peak calling statistics

Peak region size

	rep1	idr_opt	overlap_opt
Min size	150.0	150.0	150.0
25 percentile	433.0	547.0	463.0
50 percentile (median)	793.0	898.0	821.0
75 percentile	1252.0	1332.0	1273.0
Max size	3916.0	3916.0	3916.0
Mean	896.2395794066725	983.2952651559443	919.9666559239275

Peak enrichment

Fraction of reads in peaks (FRiP)

FRiP for macs2 raw peaks

	rep1	rep1-pr1	rep1-pr2
Fraction of Reads in Peaks	0.5199408344931058	0.5160828364502867	0.5152396282904704

FRiP for overlap peaks

	rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2
Fraction of Reads in Peaks	0.5166516123460044

FRiP for IDR peaks

	rep1-pr1_vs_rep1-pr2
Fraction of Reads in Peaks	0.5035947360748341

For macs2 raw peaks:

repX: Peak from true replicate X
repX-prY: Peak from Yth pseudoreplicates from replicate X
pooled: Peak from pooled true replicates (pool of rep1, rep2, ...)
pooled-pr1: Peak from 1st pooled pseudo replicate (pool of rep1-pr1, rep2-pr1, ...)
pooled-pr2: Peak from 2nd pooled pseudo replicate (pool of rep1-pr2, rep2-pr2, ...)

For overlap/IDR peaks:

repX_vs_repY: Comparing two peaks from true replicates X and Y
repX-pr1_vs_repX-pr2: Comparing two peaks from both pseudoreplicates from replicate X
pooled-pr1_vs_pooled-pr2: Comparing two peaks from 1st and 2nd pooled pseudo replicates