ATAqC

Sample Information

Sample Day4-5-D1-FrozenKera-10E-CGAGGCTG-AGGCTTAG_R1.PE2SE
Genome hg19
Paired/Single-ended Paired-ended
Read length 76

Summary

Read count from sequencer 58,015,578
Read count successfully aligned 56,814,147
Read count after filtering for mapping quality 49,111,922
Read count after removing duplicate reads 40,680,981
Read count after removing mitochondrial reads (final read count) 31,491,910
Note that all these read counts are determined using 'samtools view' - as such,
these are all reads found in the file, whether one end of a pair or a single
end read. In other words, if your file is paired end, then you should divide
these counts by two. Each step follows the previous step; for example, the
duplicate reads were removed after reads were removed for low mapping quality.
This bar chart also shows the filtering process and where the reads were lost
over the process. Note that each step is sequential - as such, there may
have been more mitochondrial reads which were already filtered because of
high duplication or low mapping quality. Note that all these read counts are
determined using 'samtools view' - as such, these are all reads found in
the file, whether one end of a pair or a single end read. In other words,
if your file is paired end, then you should divide these counts by two.

Alignment statistics

Bowtie alignment log

29007789 reads; of these:
  29007789 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
    1150727 (3.97%) aligned concordantly 0 times
    21172017 (72.99%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
    6685045 (23.05%) aligned concordantly >1 times
    ----
    1150727 pairs aligned concordantly 0 times; of these:
      283693 (24.65%) aligned discordantly 1 time
    ----
    867034 pairs aligned 0 times concordantly or discordantly; of these:
      1734068 mates make up the pairs; of these:
        1201431 (69.28%) aligned 0 times
        256306 (14.78%) aligned exactly 1 time
        276331 (15.94%) aligned >1 times
97.93% overall alignment rate

  

Samtools flagstat

58015578 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
0 + 0 secondary
0 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
56814147 + 0 mapped (97.93%:-nan%)
58015578 + 0 paired in sequencing
29007789 + 0 read1
29007789 + 0 read2
55714124 + 0 properly paired (96.03%:-nan%)
56493312 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
320835 + 0 singletons (0.55%:-nan%)
69620 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
34047 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

  

Filtering statistics

Mapping quality > q30 (out of total) 49,111,922 0.847
Duplicates (after filtering) 8,430,941.0 0.349
Mitochondrial reads (out of total) 8,217,145 0.145
Duplicates that are mitochondrial (out of all dups) 6,494,600 0.315
Final reads (after all filters) 31,491,910 0.543
Mapping quality refers to the quality of the read being aligned to that
particular location in the genome. A standard quality score is > 30.
Duplications are often due to PCR duplication rather than two unique reads
mapping to the same location. High duplication is an indication of poor
libraries. Mitochondrial reads are often high in chromatin accessibility
assays because the mitochondrial genome is very open. A high mitochondrial
fraction is an indication of poor libraries. Based on prior experience, a
final read fraction above 0.70 is a good library.
  

Library complexity statistics

ENCODE library complexity metrics

Metric Result
NRF 0.712201 out of range [0.8, inf]
PBC1 0.701949 out of range [0.8, inf]
PBC2 3.207765 - OK
The non-redundant fraction (NRF) is the fraction of non-redundant mapped reads
in a dataset; it is the ratio between the number of positions in the genome
that uniquely mapped reads map to and the total number of uniquely mappable
reads. The NRF should be > 0.8. The PBC1 is the ratio of genomic locations
with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic locations with AT LEAST one read
pair. PBC1 is the primary measure, and the PBC1 should be close to 1.
Provisionally 0-0.5 is severe bottlenecking, 0.5-0.8 is moderate bottlenecking,
0.8-0.9 is mild bottlenecking, and 0.9-1.0 is no bottlenecking. The PBC2 is
the ratio of genomic locations with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic
locations with EXACTLY two read pairs. The PBC2 should be significantly
greater than 1.

Picard EstimateLibraryComplexity

56,677,577

Yield prediction

Metric failed.
Preseq performs a yield prediction by subsampling the reads, calculating the
number of distinct reads, and then extrapolating out to see where the
expected number of distinct reads no longer increases. The confidence interval
gives a gauge as to the validity of the yield predictions.

Fragment length statistics

Metric Result
Fraction of reads in NFR 0.542926188989 - OK
NFR / mono-nuc reads 2.40526478383 out of range [2.5, inf]
Presence of NFR peak OK
Presence of Mono-Nuc peak OK
Presence of Di-Nuc peak OK
Open chromatin assays show distinct fragment length enrichments, as the cut
sites are only in open chromatin and not in nucleosomes. As such, peaks
representing different n-nucleosomal (ex mono-nucleosomal, di-nucleosomal)
fragment lengths will arise. Good libraries will show these peaks in a
fragment length distribution and will show specific peak ratios.

Peak statistics

Metric Result
Raw peaks 293620 - OK
Naive overlap peaks 238994 - OK
IDR peaks 133878 - OK

Raw peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 180.0
50 percentile (median) 262.0
75 percentile 461.0
Max size 2910.0
Mean 362.735041891

Naive overlap peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 347.0
50 percentile (median) 523.0
75 percentile 765.0
Max size 2934.0
Mean 594.066369867

IDR peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 474.0
50 percentile (median) 669.0
75 percentile 915.0
Max size 2499.0
Mean 724.048992366
For a good ATAC-seq experiment in human, you expect to get 100k-200k peaks 
for a specific cell type.

Sequence quality metrics

GC bias

Open chromatin assays are known to have significant GC bias. Please take this
into consideration as necessary.

Annotation-based quality metrics

Enrichment plots (TSS)

Open chromatin assays should show enrichment in open chromatin sites, such as
TSS's. An average TSS enrichment is above 6-7. A strong TSS enrichment is
above 10.
  

Annotated genomic region enrichments

Fraction of reads in universal DHS regions 13,683,465 0.452
Fraction of reads in blacklist regions 84,268 0.003
Fraction of reads in promoter regions 4,759,524 0.157
Fraction of reads in enhancer regions 11,418,543 0.377
Fraction of reads in called peak regions 19,419,445 0.641
Signal to noise can be assessed by considering whether reads are falling into
known open regions (such as DHS regions) or not. A high fraction of reads
should fall into the universal (across cell type) DHS set. A small fraction
should fall into the blacklist regions. A high set (though not all) should
fall into the promoter regions. A high set (though not all) should fall into
the enhancer regions. The promoter regions should not take up all reads, as
it is known that there is a bias for promoters in open chromatin assays.

Comparison to Roadmap DNase

This bar chart shows the correlation between the Roadmap DNase samples to
your sample, when the signal in the universal DNase peak region sets are
compared. The closer the sample is in signal distribution in the regions
to your sample, the higher the correlation.