ATAqC

Sample Information

Sample D1-Day5-FrozKera-R3-B-AAGAGGCA-GCGATCTA_R1.PE2SE
Genome hg19
Paired/Single-ended Paired-ended
Read length 76

Summary

Read count from sequencer 105,770,170
Read count successfully aligned 103,270,374
Read count after filtering for mapping quality 88,135,136
Read count after removing duplicate reads 79,794,229
Read count after removing mitochondrial reads (final read count) 21,034,932
Note that all these read counts are determined using 'samtools view' - as such,
these are all reads found in the file, whether one end of a pair or a single
end read. In other words, if your file is paired end, then you should divide
these counts by two. Each step follows the previous step; for example, the
duplicate reads were removed after reads were removed for low mapping quality.
This bar chart also shows the filtering process and where the reads were lost
over the process. Note that each step is sequential - as such, there may
have been more mitochondrial reads which were already filtered because of
high duplication or low mapping quality. Note that all these read counts are
determined using 'samtools view' - as such, these are all reads found in
the file, whether one end of a pair or a single end read. In other words,
if your file is paired end, then you should divide these counts by two.

Alignment statistics

Bowtie alignment log

52885085 reads; of these:
  52885085 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
    29773919 (56.30%) aligned concordantly 0 times
    17485888 (33.06%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
    5625278 (10.64%) aligned concordantly >1 times
    ----
    29773919 pairs aligned concordantly 0 times; of these:
      21029867 (70.63%) aligned discordantly 1 time
    ----
    8744052 pairs aligned 0 times concordantly or discordantly; of these:
      17488104 mates make up the pairs; of these:
        2499796 (14.29%) aligned 0 times
        602003 (3.44%) aligned exactly 1 time
        14386305 (82.26%) aligned >1 times
97.64% overall alignment rate

  

Samtools flagstat

105770170 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
0 + 0 secondary
0 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
103270374 + 0 mapped (97.64%:-nan%)
105770170 + 0 paired in sequencing
52885085 + 0 read1
52885085 + 0 read2
46222332 + 0 properly paired (43.70%:-nan%)
102711160 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
559214 + 0 singletons (0.53%:-nan%)
2447368 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
121710 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

  

Filtering statistics

Mapping quality > q30 (out of total) 88,135,136 0.833
Duplicates (after filtering) 8,340,907.0 0.442
Mitochondrial reads (out of total) 12,076,828 0.117
Duplicates that are mitochondrial (out of all dups) 10,037,798 0.186
Final reads (after all filters) 21,034,932 0.199
Mapping quality refers to the quality of the read being aligned to that
particular location in the genome. A standard quality score is > 30.
Duplications are often due to PCR duplication rather than two unique reads
mapping to the same location. High duplication is an indication of poor
libraries. Mitochondrial reads are often high in chromatin accessibility
assays because the mitochondrial genome is very open. A high mitochondrial
fraction is an indication of poor libraries. Based on prior experience, a
final read fraction above 0.70 is a good library.
  

Library complexity statistics

ENCODE library complexity metrics

Metric Result
NRF 0.586667 out of range [0.8, inf]
PBC1 0.568571 out of range [0.8, inf]
PBC2 2.211676 - OK
The non-redundant fraction (NRF) is the fraction of non-redundant mapped reads
in a dataset; it is the ratio between the number of positions in the genome
that uniquely mapped reads map to and the total number of uniquely mappable
reads. The NRF should be > 0.8. The PBC1 is the ratio of genomic locations
with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic locations with AT LEAST one read
pair. PBC1 is the primary measure, and the PBC1 should be close to 1.
Provisionally 0-0.5 is severe bottlenecking, 0.5-0.8 is moderate bottlenecking,
0.8-0.9 is mild bottlenecking, and 0.9-1.0 is no bottlenecking. The PBC2 is
the ratio of genomic locations with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic
locations with EXACTLY two read pairs. The PBC2 should be significantly
greater than 1.

Picard EstimateLibraryComplexity

39,698,665

Yield prediction

Metric failed.
Preseq performs a yield prediction by subsampling the reads, calculating the
number of distinct reads, and then extrapolating out to see where the
expected number of distinct reads no longer increases. The confidence interval
gives a gauge as to the validity of the yield predictions.

Fragment length statistics

Metric Result
Fraction of reads in NFR 0.436742309612 - OK
NFR / mono-nuc reads 1.53530201248 out of range [2.5, inf]
Presence of NFR peak OK
Presence of Mono-Nuc peak OK
Presence of Di-Nuc peak OK
Open chromatin assays show distinct fragment length enrichments, as the cut
sites are only in open chromatin and not in nucleosomes. As such, peaks
representing different n-nucleosomal (ex mono-nucleosomal, di-nucleosomal)
fragment lengths will arise. Good libraries will show these peaks in a
fragment length distribution and will show specific peak ratios.

Peak statistics

Metric Result
Raw peaks 274619 - OK
Naive overlap peaks 199060 - OK
IDR peaks 118322 - OK

Raw peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 174.0
50 percentile (median) 262.0
75 percentile 466.0
Max size 2276.0
Mean 373.892429147

Naive overlap peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 374.0
50 percentile (median) 573.0
75 percentile 875.0
Max size 2861.0
Mean 666.745101979

IDR peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 532.0
50 percentile (median) 761.0
75 percentile 1063.0
Max size 2861.0
Mean 827.168125961
For a good ATAC-seq experiment in human, you expect to get 100k-200k peaks 
for a specific cell type.

Sequence quality metrics

GC bias

Open chromatin assays are known to have significant GC bias. Please take this
into consideration as necessary.

Annotation-based quality metrics

Enrichment plots (TSS)

Open chromatin assays should show enrichment in open chromatin sites, such as
TSS's. An average TSS enrichment is above 6-7. A strong TSS enrichment is
above 10.
  

Annotated genomic region enrichments

Fraction of reads in universal DHS regions 7,888,687 0.392
Fraction of reads in blacklist regions 60,800 0.003
Fraction of reads in promoter regions 2,555,943 0.127
Fraction of reads in enhancer regions 7,530,612 0.374
Fraction of reads in called peak regions 11,191,127 0.556
Signal to noise can be assessed by considering whether reads are falling into
known open regions (such as DHS regions) or not. A high fraction of reads
should fall into the universal (across cell type) DHS set. A small fraction
should fall into the blacklist regions. A high set (though not all) should
fall into the promoter regions. A high set (though not all) should fall into
the enhancer regions. The promoter regions should not take up all reads, as
it is known that there is a bias for promoters in open chromatin assays.

Comparison to Roadmap DNase

This bar chart shows the correlation between the Roadmap DNase samples to
your sample, when the signal in the universal DNase peak region sets are
compared. The closer the sample is in signal distribution in the regions
to your sample, the higher the correlation.