ATAqC

Sample Information

Sample D1-Day3-FrozKera-R3-B-CTCTCTAC-GCGATCTA_R1.PE2SE
Genome hg19
Paired/Single-ended Paired-ended
Read length 76

Summary

Read count from sequencer 85,491,196
Read count successfully aligned 83,560,695
Read count after filtering for mapping quality 72,144,263
Read count after removing duplicate reads 65,520,330
Read count after removing mitochondrial reads (final read count) 30,106,074
Note that all these read counts are determined using 'samtools view' - as such,
these are all reads found in the file, whether one end of a pair or a single
end read. In other words, if your file is paired end, then you should divide
these counts by two. Each step follows the previous step; for example, the
duplicate reads were removed after reads were removed for low mapping quality.
This bar chart also shows the filtering process and where the reads were lost
over the process. Note that each step is sequential - as such, there may
have been more mitochondrial reads which were already filtered because of
high duplication or low mapping quality. Note that all these read counts are
determined using 'samtools view' - as such, these are all reads found in
the file, whether one end of a pair or a single end read. In other words,
if your file is paired end, then you should divide these counts by two.

Alignment statistics

Bowtie alignment log

42745598 reads; of these:
  42745598 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
    17311284 (40.50%) aligned concordantly 0 times
    19807075 (46.34%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
    5627239 (13.16%) aligned concordantly >1 times
    ----
    17311284 pairs aligned concordantly 0 times; of these:
      11997456 (69.30%) aligned discordantly 1 time
    ----
    5313828 pairs aligned 0 times concordantly or discordantly; of these:
      10627656 mates make up the pairs; of these:
        1930501 (18.16%) aligned 0 times
        592793 (5.58%) aligned exactly 1 time
        8104362 (76.26%) aligned >1 times
97.74% overall alignment rate

  

Samtools flagstat

85491196 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
0 + 0 secondary
0 + 0 supplementary
0 + 0 duplicates
83560695 + 0 mapped (97.74%:-nan%)
85491196 + 0 paired in sequencing
42745598 + 0 read1
42745598 + 0 read2
50868628 + 0 properly paired (59.50%:-nan%)
82929894 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
630801 + 0 singletons (0.74%:-nan%)
1427968 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
111158 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

  

Filtering statistics

Mapping quality > q30 (out of total) 72,144,263 0.844
Duplicates (after filtering) 6,623,933.0 0.306
Mitochondrial reads (out of total) 10,659,241 0.128
Duplicates that are mitochondrial (out of all dups) 8,175,052 0.271
Final reads (after all filters) 30,106,074 0.352
Mapping quality refers to the quality of the read being aligned to that
particular location in the genome. A standard quality score is > 30.
Duplications are often due to PCR duplication rather than two unique reads
mapping to the same location. High duplication is an indication of poor
libraries. Mitochondrial reads are often high in chromatin accessibility
assays because the mitochondrial genome is very open. A high mitochondrial
fraction is an indication of poor libraries. Based on prior experience, a
final read fraction above 0.70 is a good library.
  

Library complexity statistics

ENCODE library complexity metrics

Metric Result
NRF 0.734601 out of range [0.8, inf]
PBC1 0.733212 out of range [0.8, inf]
PBC2 3.742745 - OK
The non-redundant fraction (NRF) is the fraction of non-redundant mapped reads
in a dataset; it is the ratio between the number of positions in the genome
that uniquely mapped reads map to and the total number of uniquely mappable
reads. The NRF should be > 0.8. The PBC1 is the ratio of genomic locations
with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic locations with AT LEAST one read
pair. PBC1 is the primary measure, and the PBC1 should be close to 1.
Provisionally 0-0.5 is severe bottlenecking, 0.5-0.8 is moderate bottlenecking,
0.8-0.9 is mild bottlenecking, and 0.9-1.0 is no bottlenecking. The PBC2 is
the ratio of genomic locations with EXACTLY one read pair over the genomic
locations with EXACTLY two read pairs. The PBC2 should be significantly
greater than 1.

Picard EstimateLibraryComplexity

76,630,011

Yield prediction

Metric failed.
Preseq performs a yield prediction by subsampling the reads, calculating the
number of distinct reads, and then extrapolating out to see where the
expected number of distinct reads no longer increases. The confidence interval
gives a gauge as to the validity of the yield predictions.

Fragment length statistics

Metric Result
Fraction of reads in NFR 0.443053678622 - OK
NFR / mono-nuc reads 1.58738880261 out of range [2.5, inf]
Presence of NFR peak OK
Presence of Mono-Nuc peak OK
Presence of Di-Nuc peak OK
Open chromatin assays show distinct fragment length enrichments, as the cut
sites are only in open chromatin and not in nucleosomes. As such, peaks
representing different n-nucleosomal (ex mono-nucleosomal, di-nucleosomal)
fragment lengths will arise. Good libraries will show these peaks in a
fragment length distribution and will show specific peak ratios.

Peak statistics

Metric Result
Raw peaks 274419 - OK
Naive overlap peaks 213123 - OK
IDR peaks 122182 - OK

Raw peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 173.0
50 percentile (median) 262.0
75 percentile 497.0
Max size 2224.0
Mean 382.770369399

Naive overlap peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 381.0
50 percentile (median) 581.0
75 percentile 852.0
Max size 3319.0
Mean 653.164581017

IDR peak file statistics

Min size 150.0
25 percentile 542.0
50 percentile (median) 754.0
75 percentile 1022.0
Max size 3319.0
Mean 806.035332537
For a good ATAC-seq experiment in human, you expect to get 100k-200k peaks 
for a specific cell type.

Sequence quality metrics

GC bias

Open chromatin assays are known to have significant GC bias. Please take this
into consideration as necessary.

Annotation-based quality metrics

Enrichment plots (TSS)

Open chromatin assays should show enrichment in open chromatin sites, such as
TSS's. An average TSS enrichment is above 6-7. A strong TSS enrichment is
above 10.
  

Annotated genomic region enrichments

Fraction of reads in universal DHS regions 12,388,602 0.431
Fraction of reads in blacklist regions 77,738 0.003
Fraction of reads in promoter regions 4,434,295 0.154
Fraction of reads in enhancer regions 10,724,119 0.373
Fraction of reads in called peak regions 19,294,734 0.671
Signal to noise can be assessed by considering whether reads are falling into
known open regions (such as DHS regions) or not. A high fraction of reads
should fall into the universal (across cell type) DHS set. A small fraction
should fall into the blacklist regions. A high set (though not all) should
fall into the promoter regions. A high set (though not all) should fall into
the enhancer regions. The promoter regions should not take up all reads, as
it is known that there is a bias for promoters in open chromatin assays.

Comparison to Roadmap DNase

This bar chart shows the correlation between the Roadmap DNase samples to
your sample, when the signal in the universal DNase peak region sets are
compared. The closer the sample is in signal distribution in the regions
to your sample, the higher the correlation.